Then wandering through WAG’s shop I found a corking comment on an
old posting there. Well worth the full recycling here. Two brief comments from
yours truly to follow.
“Nalliah
Thayabharan says:
Marx’s effort to derive the market price of goods from their
value, the labor that went into them, was a vestige of the 19th-century
economic theories of David Ricardo and John Stuart Mill. By the time Marx died,
economists had already given up trying to relate price to value and were
beginning to understand that value was a chimera. With the growing dominance of
technology, it had become impossible to locate value in the time required to
produce goods, as Marx, following Ricardo and Mill, had tried to do. Machines
make products incredibly fast; but these products aren’t worth any less than if
workers had spent days toiling at them, as Marx’s theory suggests. Marx’s
essential idea, influenced by Ricardo, was that capitalism would become less
and less profitable and that its downward spiral toward the abyss of
deflation—lower prices, lower profits—would be followed by worldwide
revolution. Instead, capitalism has become vastly more profitable.
Marx’s writing style was a calamity: full of sometimes puerile
vehemence, Marx heaped scorn on his opponents, inaugurating the long Marxist
tradition of mercilessly deriding anyone with incorrect opinions. Marx
displayed particular contempt for the high-living, dandyish Ferdinand Lassalle,
a fellow socialist also of Jewish origin. In a letter to Engels, Marx mocked
Lassalle, who supposedly had African ancestry, as a repulsive “combination of
Jewry and Germanism with the negroid basic substance”; “the pushiness of this
lad is also nigger-like,” he added. In Marx’s pamphlets, mudslinging abounds:
Marx’s heavy-handed insults tend to make us doubt Marx himself, since he relies
so much on vituperation instead of reasoned argument.
The purpose of Marx’s work was to sabotage the nascent socialist
movement; he reframed all of the socialists who came before him as exponents of
“utopian socialism” and his ideas as so-called “scientific socialism”, the
theory of which the people must follow dogmatically as a secular religion, no
matter how much it fails in practice. It should be noted that before Marx ever
wrote a word the socialist movement already existed in Germany, France, Britain
and elsewhere, each with their own national expressions and ideas of how to
improve the situation of the working-class following the Industrial Revolution.
In later times, after Marx and especially after Lenin used his work to create
Bolshevism, his followers have tried to monopolise the phrase and insist unless
you follow Marx’s theories, you cannot be a socialist. This is a clear fraud
and usurpation.
Marx’s best known work is the book Das Kapital, which fails to
mention that money is printed out of thin air and keeps the name of his
cousins, the Rothschilds, out of it, despite the fact that they were the
richest and most powerful capitalist family in the whole world. Rothschild
hired Marx to draft a social doctrine to invert moral order for centralizing
their nation state’s wealth Into Rothschild controlled coffers. Marx saw free
trade as positive because it undermines established nations and cultures.
The most pronounced and consistent aspect of Marx’s ideology was
his extreme and radical hatred of Russia and everything to do with
the culture of that nation. Marx and Engles regarded Russians and Slavs in
general as subhuman (völkerabfall) barbarians. Marx used the newspaper Neue
Rheinische Zeitung to try and incite a war against Russia . This Russophobia was also
behind the strange alliance with Tory, David Urquhart, when he moved to London and Marx thus has
the blood of the people who died in the Crimean War on his Jewish hands. Henry
Hyndman, who spent many hours in Marx’s company in his Record of an Adventurous
Life attributed this anti-Russian obsession to Marx’s Jewish ethnocentrism.
Millions of people are still under the misapprehension that
Marxism / Communism is against profiteering dishonest banks and multi national
companies.. The Rothschild banking family – the richest and most powerful
banksters, for the past 200 years – financed Karl Marx’s pretense of an attack
on the profiteering dishonest.banksters, in order to fool the masses, and it
worked. Marx’s hidden message was: “Forget your individual rights and privileges
and trust in the State and the Trade Unions, and they’ll do your thinking for
you.” Millions of people believed that nonsense, and subsequently allowed
‘others’ to do their thinking for them. The trade unions and the governments
are ALL working for the Rothschild’s – who own the banks, including Bank of
England, US Federal Reserve,and all the big multi national companies, dangle
politicians like rag dolls and hold all of the people as tax-debt slaves,
through their corrupt central banks and their funny money.
The name “Federal Reserve Bank” is not federal, nor is it owned
by the government. It is privately owned. Its employees are not in the civil
service. Its physical property is held under private deeds, and is subject to
local taxation. It is an engine that has created private wealth that is
unimaginable, even to the most financially sophisticated. It has enabled an
imperial elite to manipulate US
economy for its own agenda and enlisted the US government itself as its
enforcer. The US Federal Reserve Bank controls the times, dictates business,
affects Americans’ homes and practically everything in which Americans are
interested. It takes a powerful force to maintain an empire, and this one is no
different. The concerns of the leadership of the “Federal Reserve” and its
secretive international benefactors appear to go well beyond currency and
interest rates. Alan Greenspan, served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from
1987 to 2006, stated at the annual Dinner of Francis Boyer Lecture of The
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research on December 5, 1996:
“Augmenting concerns about the Federal Reserve is the perception that we are a secretive organization, operating behind closed doors, not always in the interests of the nation as a whole. This is regrettable, and we continuously strive to alter this misperception.”
“Augmenting concerns about the Federal Reserve is the perception that we are a secretive organization, operating behind closed doors, not always in the interests of the nation as a whole. This is regrettable, and we continuously strive to alter this misperception.”
The privately owned Federal Reserve has confused the public,
lied to them and stole their gold and silver. All the perplexities, confusion
and distress in America
arise, not from defects in the Constitution, and not from want of honor or
virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and
circulation. Of all the contrivances devised for cheating the laboring classes
of mankind, none has been more effective than that which deludes him with paper
money. After many years of blundering toward it, and only a few months before
the beginning of the World War 1, Rothschild found the formula for the most
efficient credit machine that was ever invented. This was the Federal Reserve
System. Most people are unsure of the meanings of words such as money, dollar,
wealth, inflation and credit. The average person would be very surprised if
they knew how the money system used to work compared to how it operates now.
The essence of psychological warfare is to confuse the meaning of words, and
infiltrate the mind with conflicting concepts. The use of the word Federal in
the name federal Reserve leads the public to believe that the Federal Reserve
is a government institution, when it is really a private corporation owned by
foreign and domestic banks and operated for profit.The Federal Reserve controls
America ’s
money supply and interest rates, and there by manipulates the entire economy,
in violation of
1. Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution that
expressly charges Congress with power to coin money and regulate the value
thereof, and.
2. Article 1, Section 10 of the constitution says “No State
shall make any thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in payment of Debts.”
Over time, gold and silver coins were removed from American
money supply and removed as backing for American paper currency and replaced
with debt (or credit).
The definition of dollar has changed to hide the fact that a
dollar is not money, but a unit of measurement for gold and silver coin. For
example:
1. Title 12 United States
Code Section 152 says: “The terms lawful money or lawful money of the United States shall be construed to mean gold or
silver coin of the United
States .”
2. Title 31 United States
Code, Section 5101 says: “The money of account of the United States
shall be expressed in dollars.”
The recent equivalent to the goldsmith’s receipt for gold is the
Federal Reserve Note. The word “Federal” implies Federal government, but the
Federal Reserve is a privately owned corporation. The word “Reserve” implies
that something gives the paper receipt value, but no gold or silver backs this
paper. The word “Note” implies a contract, because legally a note must state
who is paying, what is being paid, to whom and when. Most people say something
like, “I have a dollar bill”. But what is a bill? A bill is a receipt of a debt
owed by one person or company to another. Therefore, a “dollar bill” is a
receipt (or bill) of debt of one dollar that is owed. From 1914 to 1963,
Federal Reserve Notes never claimed to be money, nor did they claim to be
dollars. A note for five dollars read: “The United States of America will pay
to the bearer on demand five dollars.”
How can a promise to pay five dollars be five dollars? To the
left of the President’s picture and above the bank seal, it said: “This note is
legal tender for all debts public and private, and is redeemable in lawful
money at the United States Treasury or at any Federal Reserve Bank.” In 1963,
the Federal Reserve began to issue its first series of notes without the
promise, while taking notes with the promise out of circulation. How can paper
become what it promises by removing the promise? To the left of the President’s
picture and above the bank seal, it now read: “This note is legal tender for
all debts public and private.” A note is a proof of debt. It is not possible to
pay off a debt with a debt. No debt can be paid in full unless paid in gold or
silver, coined and regulated in value by Congress. The name “Federal Reserve
Note” is a fraudulent label since each word claims to be something that in
reality it is not. By removing the promise to redeem the note in lawful money,
the Federal Government in cooperation with the Federal Reserve, eliminated the
monetary system of the United
States as established by the Constitution
and replaced it with something totally different.
If you are holding a one dollar Federal Reserve Note, the
question is: “what is one dollar?”
The answer is absolutely nothing. The number measures no
substance.”
Firstly that last sentence says it all. All is a spell.
Secondly Roth are not anything other than a 3rd level
sleight of hand operators, too retarded to associate with. Which bit of Europe & subsidiaries franchise is occluded here?
There never was a Dark Age for these magiklowns. 1st level franchise
operator of the current age wandered around under the circle jerk name of Msh. That
gives ample time to have 2nd level intergenerational silken sleeper
genes laid to await revivification thousands of years later at the second
attempt out of the hat.
If one were to take the French wine growing term terroir and
apply the concept to the shit house terrain on the saddle north of Arabia
Felix, then the fruit of that region truly is toxic and travels well.
BWAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA
No comments:
Post a Comment
Voyoy cheeky, leave us a deadletteredroped..