Tuesday, 13 November 2018

EUMINDMONGMING or Einsatzgruppen 6 Sigma Practitioners

You have your job interview scheduled—congratulations! Now it’s time to prepare, and we’ve got you covered.




You were saying again……what….what about your references.

Reassemble the words.

Gates night watch open stand down city.


Saturday, 10 November 2018

War News Updates: Remembering 'Kristallnacht 80 Years Later.....

War News Updates: Remembering 'Kristallnacht 80 Years Later: DW: German politicians remember Nazi Kristallnacht pogrom Germany is marking the 80th anniversary of attacks on Jews that foreshadowed ...

…or, Watch out a London Brotherhood proto-OMG is coming through.

Heller has written a comprehensive study of Lehi (aka the Stern Gang), Israel's most militant underground movement in the period 1941-48. He focuses on the ideology of the movement and explains that Lehi split from the broader Etzel (IZL) movement because it felt Etzel was not engaged in real terror and Lehi ideologically disagreed with Etzel on the main enemy (Etzel targetted the British only in Palestine, Lehi took on the whole British Empire). Also, Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism, believed in a formal military Jewish organization, not underground activities. Lehi saw Jabotinsky as a an old reactionary.
Like any other radical nationalist movement, Lehi's outlook was influenced by a variety of extreme nationalist orientations. It rejected not only diaspora Jewry but also Zionism, espousing instead ideas borrowed from the Canaanite movement calling for the creation of a new Israeli movement without the diaspora. Israel Eldad, the chief Lehi ideologist, even believed in the restoration of the Jewish monarchy and in the glory of Jewish history, hardly a Hebraic-Canaanite ideological occupation.
While an excellent, well-researched, and probably unsurpassed study, Heller over-intellectualizes a revolutionary terrorist movement. Given that Lehi was less an ideological forum than a terrorist organization, Heller's extensive and highly commendable research should have been directed less to Lehi's ideas and more to its terrorist activities. Lehi contributed to the ouster of the British in Palestine but it played a very minor role in the development of radical nationalist ideology. Further, when Lehi's leading terrorist, Yitzhak Shamir, many years later became prime minister of Israel, he ignored the presumed ideology of Lehi and instead adopted Jabotinsky's doctrine of a "complete Eretz Israel."

What was most remarkable about Yitzhak Shamir's life was how little his thinking changed from his youthful days as a member of Betar (1929-33), the Zionist brown shirt organization in Poland, where he was born Yitzhak Yezernitzky, to his last days in Israel at age 96.
As a Betari youth he was greatly influenced by its founder, Vladimir Jabotinsky, the founder also of "Gun Zionism" or, more euphemistically, "Revisionist Zionism."
Jabotinsky's vision, the same as Zionism founder Theodor Herzl's, was "a Jewish majority in a Jewish state in the whole of the biblical Land of Israel." Jabotinsky, however, realized that this had to be accomplished by force, just as European countries established their colonies by force. "This made sense to me," Shamir wrote commenting on Jabotinsky's ideas.
In 1939—four years after he migrated to British Mandate Palestine—Shamir met the chauvinist Avraham Stern, head of the terrorist Stern Gang. According to Stern, "Rights were awarded only to the strong, who are allowed to take them by force if they are not given to them legally."
The group declared England as the enemy and made advances to Nazi Germany for an alliance. "The establishment of the historic Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the German Reich" was part of the proposal a Stern representative made in 1941 to the German minister to Beirut. Shamir omitted this episode in his autobiography.
The racism of the group was strong. One member, Uri Greenberg, referred to the Arabs as "the filthiest people in the East." Such comments were common in the gang. Considering the Arabs, even all non-Jews, as equals was not in their thinking.
Shamir therefore had no trouble in approving the assassination in 1944 of Lord Moyne (Churchill's friend). Dr. Amitsur Ilan claimed Shamir was the "prime mover" behind the assassination.
Shamir also was one of three terrorists who blew up the King David Hotel in 1946, killing 88. To escape detection, he disguised himself as a rabbi, with a "full black beard, and long kaftan." He forgot, however, to trim his eyebrows. A street detective recognized the eyebrows under the black felt rabbi's hat and captured him. Shamir was then imprisoned, escaping after two years. He murdered his own colleague, Eliahu Giladi, because of disagreement.
Even more memorable were Shamir's involvements in the attack on the small village of Deir Yassin and the murder of Swedish U.N. mediator Count Folke Bernadotte, both in 1948. The Deir Yassin attack occurred five weeks before a single Arab army became a belligerent. The high number of elderly, women and children killed indicated racist wantonness. Among the 280-some dead were 30 infants. "I saw cut off genitalia and women's crushed stomachs," reported investigator Zvi Ankori. There were no wounded.
Even though Bernadotte had saved an estimated 30,000 Jews from the gas chambers during World War II, his "crime" was his effort to have Transjordan excluded from Zionist claims. For this he was assassinated.
Such deeds brought world attention to Shamir and his gang. Besides these headliners, Shamir estimated that his group carried out about 300 other "actions," with himself as participant in 41 of them.
After the war Shamir was at a loss. What to do? He learned that Israel's secret service Mossad needed men with "special abilities acquired by such formerly 'wanted' men as myself," he wrote. "It changed my life." Explained Shamir: "I felt at home very soon: I had returned to an atmosphere, behavior, incentives and points of view that were in many ways, familiar to me." Now all his former activities were done with establishment approval.
As head of Mossad Shamir not only protected Israeli citizens, but also "Jews abroad." He not only vowed to make "unforgettable object lessons in the reality and reach of the Jewish state," but claimed a right to interfere in the internal affairs in every other nation state in the world. It seems preposterous. But it is a reality even today. Witness the recent assassinations of law-abiding Iranian scientists—deemed, without trial, of course, to be enemies of Israel.
Israeli historian Benny Morris wrote that as Mossad head Shamir ran mostly "ad hoc operations, usually involving assassinations." This was the secretive kind of life Shamir loved. I was "a naturally un-talkative man," he wrote. "I preferred to work behind the scenes."
According to Israel Shahak, the late noted Israeli humanist, under Shamir's premiership (1983-84 and 1986-92) Israel was "governed like a dictatorship." "Everything happens as he says," Shahak observed. Shamir was not interested in the budget or the poor. He focused almost exclusively on the military and on foreign affairs, and particularly on Washington, DC.
Colonizing Palestinian lands—the chief cause of the "Arab-Israeli conflict"—was, according to Shamir, "sacred work; it cannot stop; it is the heart of our existence and life." Giving the Palestinians anything was unacceptable. Talking peace was wasting time.
Accordingly, Shamir turned down George Shultz's peace plan of 1988 and James Baker's the following year. During congressional testimony Baker sarcastically told Shamir: "Take this number: (202) 456- 1414. When you're serious about peace, call us."
The boon in Shamir's life was Ronald Reagan. The two established the "joint military political group," which entwined the U.S. and Israeli military establishments to such an extent that our own sovereignty was, and still is, compromised.
For him Reagan lifted the ban on cluster weapons, which Israel used against the Lebanese. Shamir also got an agreement on duty—free trade—plus $1.7 billion in military aid and $900 million in economic aid.
In addition, wrote Reagan biographer Richard Reeves, "Reagan and Shamir concluded one agreement after another—most secret, some unwritten." Shamir got so much that his friends back in Israel asked, "Well, where's the kitchen sink?"
Not surprisingly Shamir continued his racist attitude toward Palestinians into his premiership. At the beginning of the first intifada (uprising) in 1987 he called the Palestinians "grasshoppers." When asked about it, he repeated it on television, "Yes, grasshoppers; you need to stomp on 'em every once in a while."
After retiring in 1992 he enjoyed the status of adviser and elder statesman. Of subsequent leaders, he said, "I had encouraged and groomed almost all of them." He mentioned future Prime Ministers Ehud Olmert and Binyamin Netanyahu in particular.
Indeed, judging by Israel's current practices and the growing popularity of "transfer," Yitzhak Shamir not only trained subsequent leaders but converted Avraham Stern's minority views of the 1940s, including the racist ones, into the views of a majority of Israelis today.

On the Jewish holiday of Shavuot, June 1-2, 1941 (5701 on the Hebrew calendar), the Muslim residents of Baghdad carried out a savage pogrom against their Jewish neighbors. In this pogrom, known by its Arabic name al-Farhoud, about 200 Jews were murdered and thousands wounded. Jewish property was plundered and many homes set ablaze.
Within a week, the British ousted the pro-Nazi government of General Rashid Ali, which had seized power in a coup d’état two months earlier, and restored the legal Iraqi government. That government appointed a commission of inquiry into the pogrom, which determined that the Nazi propaganda of Radio Berlin had been one of the massacre’s foremost instigators.
The commission’s report also identified the main individuals who had impelled the assault. It pointed to the extensive activity of Dr. Fritz Grobba, the German ambassador to Baghdad, and to the activity of the former mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin Husseini, who had fled to Iraq from Mandatory Palestine in October 1939 (after a short spell in Beirut) and begun inciting against the Iraqi Jews. The mufti had also worked with Iraqi subversive elements, including Rashid Ali, to overthrow Iraq’s ruling Hashemite monarchy and install a pro-Nazi regime.
In an attempt to win Arab and Muslim hearts and minds, the first Arab-language Nazi radio station was launched in Berlin prior to the outbreak of the Second World War, broadcasting anti-British, anti-American, anti-Soviet, and particularly anti-Semitic propaganda. It thus helped spread radical anti-Semitism in the Middle East, where it found common ground with the anti-Jewish tendencies in Islam.
The messages in the propaganda broadcasts were designed to achieve certain goals, such as winning the Arab population’s sympathy for the Nazis and the Führer; inciting against the British and French presence in the Middle East; stoking Arab national sentiments; and, last but not least, wildly inciting against the Jews, who were accused inter alia of stealing the Arabs’ money and being behind all the Arab world’s woes.
This propaganda mill employed many teams of both civilian and military personnel, including writers, translators, academics, and Middle East experts. Among others, the broadcasts featured Arab immigrants and leaders. The mythic broadcaster and director of the Arabic station was the journalist Yunus Bahri, who reached Berlin after fleeing his native Iraq, where he had been sentenced to death for pro-Nazi activity. He was recruited by Grobba and opened his broadcasts with his famous line, “The Arab Lord Haw-Haw, this is Berlin, greetings to the Arabs.”
Known for his virulent anti-Semitism, Bahri stated proudly in a memoir he wrote after the war, “I was the first Arab to collaborate with the Nazis.” His hatred towards Jews was so intense that he was summoned for a reprimand in Propaganda Minister Goebbels’s office because of his excessively vitriolic attacks on Jews and especially his constant use of the term “Jewish criminals.”
Four days before the Farhoud, Bahri stated on Radio Berlin:
"Judaism, which is compounded of Zionism and Freemasonry, has created a fortress in England behind which it carries out its crimes. The Arabs fought the Jews and expelled them from the Arabian Peninsula 1,400 years ago. The Prophet Muhammad was the first to expel them. In our time, the Arabs witness what the Jews have done under English sponsorship.
"The Jews have declared that they want to establish a national home in Palestine which is an inseparable part of the Arab homeland. The Arabs of Iraq now see what the Jews of Basra are capable of doing under English directives. The Arabs take note of the declarations of the English statesmen, particularly the latest two by Churchill and Smuts. Smuts said that he and England owe thanks to the Jews for their help in the war.
"These words have hardened the Jews’ determination to fight the Arabs, in the certainty that after the war they would be allowed to establish the Hebrew state…. The Jews are an abomination everywhere. And recall the verse in the Koran: 'The greatest enemies of humanity are those who trust the Jews.'”
In broadcasts after the pogrom, Bahri justified the massacre and accused the Iraqi Jews of obtaining and disseminating propaganda material from the British embassy in Baghdad. He also charged them with providing the British embassy with military information about the Iraqi army. With such malicious fabrications he lent legitimacy to the Farhoud massacre.
Bahri was too self-laudatory about being the first Arab to collaborate with the Nazis. The Mufti had beaten him to it long before. Within weeks of Hitler’s rise to power, he rushed to the German consul in Jerusalem to assure him that “the Muslims in Palestine and elsewhere were enthusiastic about the new regime in Germany and looked forward to the spread of fascism throughout the region.”
Hajj Amin had been deeply implicated in the widespread massacre of Jews in Mandatory Palestine – from the April 1920 Jerusalem pogrom, for which he was sentenced to 10 years in prison by a British military court but managed to flee the country, to the 1929 riots in which 133 Jews were murdered and hundreds injured, to the 1936-39 “revolt” in which hundreds of Jews were murdered.
Against this backdrop, it was only natural for him to play a central role in the Farhoud, both in inciting the local Iraqi population against their Jewish compatriots and through his close involvement with the Rashid Ali regime.
It comes as no surprise, then, that in his memoirs the mufti blamed the Iraqi Jews for the failure of the pro-Nazi “revolution” (which in turn forced him to flee to Tehran, whence he came to Berlin where he spent the rest of the war years), thus implicitly justifying the Farhoud.
As he wrote:"The fifth column played a large role in the failure that the movement [the Rashid Ali regime] suffered in Iraq. This column consisted of different elements, of which the main one was Iraqi Jewry…. During the war, Jews who were employed in the telephone service would record the important and official conversations on reels and pass them to the British embassy in Baghdad. The Jews in the postal and telegraphic authority did the same. They hurriedly sent the embassy the telegrams and letters that reached them."
Regrettably, seventy-six years after the Farhoud, it appears that the mufti’s heirs to the Palestinian leadership have learned nothing and forgotten nothing. When Mahmoud Abbas stood beside President Trump on the White House lawn and declared to one and all that the Palestinians educate their children for peaceful coexistence with Israel, not a muscle twitched in his face.
In fact, during its 20-year-long control of the Palestinian population of the 'West Bank' and Gaza as part of the Oslo “peace” process, Abbas’s Palestinian Authority, not to mention Hamas, has subjected its subjects to a relentless hate campaign of racial and political incitement unparalleled in scope and intensity since Nazi Germany. That campaign not only delegitimizes the idea of Jewish statehood but also propagates the murder of Jews simply for being Jews.
And if history teaches us anything, it is that the translation of such words into action is all too easy.

Meanwhile poised over the ME since January 1941 was a Wall Street created talmudicstormtroopereinsatzgruppen.

Oh I wonder who got wind of all that, paid for by UK& Empire and USofA tax payers, ironmongery coming through?

(Wikipedia source)
Order of Battle, Invasion of Iran, 1941[edit]
Here is the Soviet OOB for the 25th of August 1941:[2]
44th Army (Major General A.A. Khadeyev)
20th Mountain Rifle Division
77th Mountain Rifle Division
17th Cavalry Division
24th Tank Regiment
47th Army (Major General V.V. Novikov)
63rd Mountain Rifle Division
236th Rifle Division
6th Tank Division
54th Tank Division
13th Motorcycle Regiment
53rd Army (invaded Iran from TurkmenistanTurkestan Military District on the 27th of August)
58th Rifle Corps


Friday, 9 November 2018

A Purge General opens its trap and……

...I'll bet he got great grades from his ersatzcommie fauxprofessor professionalyahewistas phonyworshipping moneymongminds.

SNAFU!: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs warns on Russia, but ...: via Defense.Gov Both Russia and China have developed capabilities that would negate some of these advantages, the chairman said. Russia ...

All one needs to know is that when they come to do battle any and all actions against the ChiComms will be clinical High Keystone coppery.

Any Russian action will be dirty nuke/trench warfare toxic to cause maximum trauma and chaos. The breadbaskets will be gone.

Anyone connecting Kursk 2000 and Drydock 2018 incidents?

Now I don’t want you to get too miserable Euroslobs but can you name me any battle you won this last 100 years? (That includes you Russia) So what makes me think that you are going to win anything once you’ve got Eurofarce in place?

As Eisenhower famously got wrong, the global commercial/martial complex has moved completely over to commercial focus in the west. Others are going to be given martial success in the cycle.

Why do you think your HDTV Pyongyang pissinyoureyes TVs and all other electronic spy devices are manufactured in slavershitholes far far away? They will ensure you never know when you have been defeated. If they were made/assembled in US/EU then the STASI on the wall functions of all these talmutronic moronic devices would have been out in the remains of the union movements and therefore current in society.

Do you really want the abrahamic psychogod stalking you 24/7 in your hovel?

Why do you think all commecrcial activity is going private again? Byebye stock market.

Would anyone other than a merc fight for a wired for sound, all seeing eye, shithouse? The only temporary privacy might be found in the aftermath of a major battle when everything for 1000 miles around is phukked.


Thursday, 8 November 2018

The Professor who gets taken seriously too much...

....the shabasspastic.

Lets consider who was reading his beginners guide to who's the problem.

Every civilisation destroying barren boybitch and childshaggin' bitchboy in power this passed 50 years grown in pestilent petridishes of ivoryshitholes. OGPUISIS talmudic fanboys and COMINTERNquimcentric blurtvenom ineffectives.

Sunday, 4 November 2018

Blast from the past-Salbuchi on DBS' show.

Adrian Salbuchi - 9/11, Finance, Zionist Machinations, Deception, & Common Law: My idea about 9/11 formed without reviewing for each items in the Internet that refute the US government story. Yah Internet is ful...

Keep an eye on http://grizzom.blogspot.com/ for Hart and Brizer hopefully bringing Salbuchi on some Monday night.


Friday, 2 November 2018

Anti-Cementic Trumpagogue Attack Smurphscreem

"The news that Khashoggi's" disfigured parts of his face and body "have been found in the garden of the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, is the end of recess for Western collaborators of the tyrannical Arab dictatorship.
After Khashoggi himself, the main loser of Istanbul's most disgusting murder is US President Donald Trump - as I predicted here weeks ago. Her statement that Saudi coverage was "credible" has caused mockery from the rest of the world by her "Lady MacBeth" side, and ridiculed her. The behavior of his own "Crown Prince" - his son-in-law Jared Kushner - was more venal than worthy of a comic opera.
As I predicted, although the Clinton family largely benefited from the Saudi largesse, the Democrats and their vast media support made the assassination of Khashoggi their new casus belli, in place of the "Russiagate" in loss of speed (in fact the same people who, over the last two years, have flooded the US airwaves with russophobic hate raised their hands to the sky, horrified, when Trump - Putin's puppet, remember - announced a nuclear arms race against Russia).
From Uber to Facebook, from JP Morgan to Virgin, dozens of companies and personalities have given up going to "desert Davos" and the kingdom "is in crisis" as the Saudi energy minister has just publicly acknowledged.
All of this is self-evident and one can easily predict the end of the brutal and brutal reign of the Saudi Caligula that killed thousands of people in Yemen, Syria, and even Saudi Arabia.
In the West, it's like suddenly turning on the light and seeing the cockroaches running at full speed. Nowhere is this show as abject as in the United Kingdom.
In the 1980s, I was sent on a parliamentary mission to Saudi Arabia, under the leadership of Sir Francis Pym, who was later named Lord, a great Tory who was Foreign Minister of Great Britain, before this function does not deteriorate due to the mediocrity and obvious lack of class of its occupants. There were tensions between the British and the Saudis who were threatening to disrupt the highly lucrative and treacherous arms deal of Al Yamamamah.
"Ointment, my dear, ointment," that's our mission, Sir Francis told me. We must cover them with ointment. "There is no question of apologizing .... I will not apologize, "he added (I repeat, at the time, it was the high class), to coat them with a good layer of ointment, this is our roadmap.
We met the Saudi king of the day and most important princes; Sir Francis was a master in his part. He never apologized, but he gave them a lot, a lot of ointment. It worked, and the dirty business of milking the old idiots in power in Riyadh has resumed.
Of course, the British profits were not comparable to the loot of the United States, and the difference between the two has only increased for the next thirty years. The other difference is that now it's not just rifles, but butter, technology, media, movies, hobbies (who knew Disneyland was a Saudi playground?) And tourism.
In reality, thousands of Western media and their little hands have been corrupted by Saudi gold. All kinds of think-tanks, "institutes," and even the Natural History Museum of Britain, received money from the House of Saud. The bad luck was that the very night the music stopped with the murder of a Washington Post columnist and the dismemberment of his body, the Saudi Embassy organized an evening in one of the august halls of this museum. .
The irony that the Creationist Kingdom ** chose to sip alcoholic cocktails in the house that Charles Darwin built, has not escaped the attention of many. Newspapers and magazines that had been fattening openly and secretly thanks to Saudi sponsorship, with advertising revenues and other arrangements between friends are now shocked! Shocked! Like the corrupt Vichy police chief who "discovers" that there are gaming tables at Humphrey Bogart's Rick's Café in the film "Casablanca".
Nobody returned his jacket as quickly as the head of public relations of the Saudi Crown Prince in the West, Thomas Friedman of the New York Times.
When appearing with CNN's Christiane Amanpour, Friedman seemed on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Having wasted tens of thousands of words for a criminal like Mohammed bin Salman! You must not regret Tom, you were well paid for the whole time it lasted!
As Oscar Wilde put it about the deathbed scene in Charles Dickens' "Little Nell" - "it would take a heart of stone not to laugh. "
But the most devastating has been corruption in the political class itself, and we will soon hear about it.
When Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn tabled a motion earlier in the year to stop British arms sales to Saudi Arabia pending an investigation into the use of these weapons in the bloody war against Yemen, the The motion could very well have passed if more than 100 Labor deputies from his own camp had not been guilty of treason. Gay Labor MPs have joined the camp of those who throw gays from the buildings. Feminist Labor MPs have joined the ranks of those who do not recognize women's rights. All these democrats supported the desert absence of freedom and democracy. I did not understand and wondered about the extent of Saudi support among Labor MPs.
Because this story has not finished making waves.
For now, the "Guardians of the Two Holy Mosques", to give the Saudi kings their title on Friday ***, are busy erasing the face of Jamal Khashoggi, a man who may have slightly criticized Saudi politics, but who supported the Saudi-backed army of head-cutters in Syria until the very moment his own head was torn from his shoulder. This man who wrote a Washington Post editorial entitled "It's time to divide Syria" was itself divided into several parts by the instigators of the failed division of Syria.
Even Shakespeare could not have written such a story.
George Galloway , RT.com , October 23, 2018
George Galloway has been a member of the British Parliament for almost 30 years. He hosts TV and radio programs (including RT). He is a filmmaker, writer and a renowned speaker.

I parked the next part of phukkwitz technology transfer over at the stoker