Friday, 3 July 2015

The SoftunUnemployed of Rentserfs and the EndunLeadership of Bitchmarkets

What do you call a country full of rotating wankstators?

Leaders in their own fields.

We might as well be at a COMINTERN meeting circa 1930. Same boybitches, faux leaders, odd bitchboys and the same scared to go off message eunuchs acting tough.

Epicures of Wanksatisfactiony.
Posted by Yasmeen Shaheen-McConnell on May 06, 2015 at 10:58 AM
 We are excited to announce the launch of our new Franklin Project Ambassadors Program! This leadership development program and local engagement strategy will address three key goals over the course of the next year:

Make national service part of the 2016 election conversation
Increase the number of service year positions available in communities across the US
Steward the next generation of national service leaders

Over 170 people applied to the program in its inaugural year, and 45 Ambassadors were selected to join the program based on their community leadership, their creativity, and their demonstrated commitment to the Franklin Project’s “big idea”. Franklin Project Chair Stan McChrystal said of the Ambassadors: “We know it takes carefully planned and well-executed action to shift American culture, and we believe that the Ambassadors Program is the first step in the next wave of citizen-centered change in this country.”

Over the next 12 months, our Ambassadors will work with community stakeholders in 25 states to work toward making national service a cultural expectation, common opportunity, and civic rite of passage in their areas. If you are interested in being connected with the Ambassador in your city, please let us know!

The program will begin with an intensive three-day training in Alexandria, VA. The program is phased so that Ambassadors go through a one-on-one design process with Franklin Project team members, before planning for an executing on a local event in each Ambassador’s city that addresses the goals of the program. A capstone seminar at the end of the program will include skills-sharing, leadership development, and organized reflection.

We are honored to have the following people join our inaugural class of Franklin Project Ambassadors:

Alen Amini Gordon Rooney Mark Payne
Cincinnati, OH Charleston, SC Chicago, IL
Amanda Panciera Greg Ericksen Marquis Hawkins
Milwaukee, WI Los Angeles, CA Dallas, TX
Anna Lenhart Jamiel Alexander Matthew Blackwell
San Diego, CA York, PA Atlanta, GA
Brandon Bodor Jamison Braun Meghan Hughes
Chicago, IL Washington, DC Columbia, SC
Brian Pawlowski Jason Crow Michael Auerbach
South Bend, IN Denver, CO New York, NY
Catherine Cheney Jason Jaffery Mi'Jan Celie Tho-Biaz
Sacramento, CA Cleveland, OH Santa Fe, NM
Charls (Roch) Turner Jeff Bryant Mike Meaney
Hamilton, MT Reno, NV Phoenix, AZ
Chelsea Martin Jennifer McArdle Nikki Gusz
Lansing, MI Flint, MI Phoenix, AZ
Dan Sullivan Jillan Hishaw Patrick   Murray
Boston, MA Charlotte, NC Boston, MA
Dev Zaveri-Tabb John-Paul Smith Pete Kalenik
San Diego, CA Durham, NC Chicago, IL
Elizabeth Barrett Josh Fryday Randy Frazier
San Luis Obispo, CA San Francisco, CA Houston, TX
Elizabeth Collins Josh Visnaw Roger Wong
Wheeling, WV New Orleans, LA New York, NY
Geoff Wilson Kevin Ward Sarah Guy
Minneapolis, MN Seattle, WA Philadelphia, PA
Godfrey Plata Lauren Boswell Thomas B. Howard, Jr.
Houston, TX Atlanta, GA Vinton, IA
Gordon Liu Luis Chavez Whitney Parnell
Wiscasset, ME Fresno, CA Washington, DC

Thursday, 2 July 2015

How Much Money to refuel a C17; again?

"If you wish to bring the body back to the UK, British Consular staff will help by putting you in touch with an international funeral director. The body will need to be embalmed and placed in a zinc-lined coffin before it can be removed from the country. It may take some time to bring the body home, especially if a post-mortem examination is held."

I have already mooted the idea that MOAB are binary warhead WMD evidence delivery/area denial black propaganda weapons.


Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Vampire light. Or. On IR. 28.

In the decaying glow of their belief systems, which we nourish and feed us, I had hoped to remain rested in sublime dullardy. Drifting gently down stream to the town each morning and returning to rest each evening under the stars after breathing my fill. I had hoped that the flames and scorching of whatever had transpired was over, that the struggles of the past were long gone, my days of peace had come. How disarming that dream was.

Within this scope now they are clearly seen in their night, the glowing OvidOnir all aflame in ceremony, green in red iRitual. iRed in iGreen DNA onanist worship. Spilled metamorphic, ever shifting, self directing, autochthonic, troglodyte, unconscious in the aggregate and without conscience. It is a toxicity of existence here in the stopped membrane of darkness. Persist sent peculiarly poisonous pecuniary penalty of the life personal and mercuric.

No more, no more I hear you murmur. GTF on with it!

Have you ever noticed, all spell like, that the more money in this system the less there is to hand? The global GDP is mega trillions of bucks and no one I know has anymore than 50 cents to hand. Everyone who might benefit from a shilling or two, the needy, poor and starving has de nada. Yet if you want to have great big naked androgyny swinging from a buttplug chandelier, sweating all over your tellyboxfish and poisoning your psyche then there is no limit to the amount of money to be had. It must have been wondrous to behold the first suggestion of a paralysed, deaf, blind and mute singing and dancing off world, off and on colour contest at a creatives spunk swapping water cooler moment and find it rejected not because of lack of available funding but because the demographics and AGENDA21 brief were not prepared yet. Once the next big one has gone off then the demographics will be just swell, injured and maimed everywhere and the refugees off planet will join in. No wonder the Magic Circle is never short of small change and small children. Ever noticed how backward the world’s most advanced society really is?

I mean why would “Lord Janner faces historical sex abuse prosecution” be thrown under a bus in a country that couldn’t give a flying fuck about anything other than keeping high speed rotating machinery in intensive care or retarded pig bladder kickers in kick-start ladyboys and BBC children’s programs presenters in hyper velocity cocaine?

I mean Janner’s proclivities in the hysterically described BBC Orwellian doublespeak of “historical child abuse”; Shirley you mean “ongoing and widespread raping of children in the UKplc and off shore, within the state sponsored sextrafficking politicocommercialchildabusecomplex, was not hidden. Just go and check out the back issues of the Golders Green local rag for continuous mentioning of his name and others, over the decades, and child abuse allegation denials FFS!

You see that is the trouble with eyes. No one is watching. No one uses them. No one knows how they really work since there is no way the mind can see through a standing or phased array. Remember what I said when this pile of steaming ordure first made emergent issue, many posting ago, about Hollywood physicists. Copenhagen be damned.

Anyway let us get on with the forensic storytelling. If you caught Corbett talking about the 65th anniversary of the Korean Police action kicking off

then, if you’ve been reading here, you will have been waiting for some mention of Jun Carnegie of IG Hamhung.


Just as the recent conspiracy bollox last weekend on UK TV, with our transsexual/crossdressing confused faux academic boybitchboy PhD, tried to convince us that the whole Cold War was caused by Gehlen coming in from the cold and no mention of terrorists operating out of DP camps into Palestine and away from the crime scene they caused. Remember there is never any iCSI at real crime scenes. No JAG at Katyn. No Interpol in Guernsey. No Hercule Poirot at any morgue, boys and girls. No Miss Marple in orphanages frequented by child killers in UKplc. No one to help the poor and soon to be dead.


So one can be sure that any and all crimes and police activity brought to our attention in the MSM are staged productions worthy of true fiction. Show trials and light operetta with berrettas de Menezes stylee.

Whilst we are on the subject of real events, real genocides, real holocausts. Charlie boy resists the urge to give us too much detail on his rock strewn love life and then gets into the meat of Holodomor.

He is correct on the coming world famine though. Scalability, always scalability. Whatever they could do in a camp they will do in a village. Whatever they do in a village they will do in a town. Whatever they did in towns they did in cities. Whatever they can do to cities they do to regions etc, etc, etc…… A global catastrophe is merely a stepping stone towards spreading the affliction afar.

Just as we have never heard of any community in any country at any time, where they were being persecuted and exterminated by yahmoney, being helped schindlerstylee. So we cannot witness the relief of Gazan prisoners today through the remainder of Palestine. And never will. For who ever heard of a group of pirates offering help to anyone anywhere at anytime?

Always take.

That is the moto of RCE/TA and wherever the Yahweists skulk. Imposed on them by the skryptomentalistgodlikecreation itself as it invented a notion of its own mind, made flesh in its own image, realised through primitives for global piracy for ever.

Metamorphosis in camera.

Blue sky

Monday, 29 June 2015



This should cover it nicely.

Or don't keep getting found bankrolling and hogging all the starring roles at the mega crime scenes if you want to be considered a light unto the world; you phukkmuppets.

Also wander through for some good stats on real happenings.  I do wonder if our famous diamondphager shitter ever got to transpose these real cattle car journeys, courtesy of NKVD/CHEKA coaching teams like modern day graduates of leadership programmes do, into her imagination and the delusional drivellings of all her other fellow security threats. A lesson to be learned here is that of making it all up and then getting used by Hollyweird to launder Fed bills through rubbish art.

Do you reckon there was some well talented geezer who could shit BoE printing plates to command? Or ten gold bars? Down down. Show me a graduate of a leadership program and I will demonstrate a recycling bitchboy or recyprocating boybitch androgyn of the phukknone.

It is all in the fake wanksterbankstergangsterskankstersystem's imagination.

Wednesday, 24 June 2015



I am, as most people know, not well-disposed toward the papacy as an institution. Granted, it has performed many charitable and laudatory works, and this must be stated for the record, for many people who write in the alternative community about the Vatican and the papacy tend unfortunately to forget this. My grievance with the papacy is the spurious nature of its claims, claims codified at the First Vatican Council in terms of an immediate and universal jurisdiction, as well as the notorious definition of papal infallibility when speaking ex cathedra on matters of faith and doctrine, in which case the pope speaks ex consensu ecclesiae, "without the consent of the church", a formula tailor made for all sorts of mischief, hair-splitting, and indeed, apostasy. While the papacy has sponsored many notable and charitable enterprises, the historical track record, as most people are aware, is morally ambiguous and dubious(to put it kindly). One need only think of Lotario di Conti (Innocent III), condemning in one breath the Fourth Crusade and the sack of Constantinople, an unjustifiable warfare against fellow Christians, while at the same time vigorously promoting the Albigensian Crusade, an organized slaughter and genocide on a scale only dwarfed later in the twentieth century. (They were, of course, "heretics," and therefore not agreed with the papacy, and hence, could be murdered with impunity.)
Similarly, as most people also know, I simply am not sympathetic to any Malthusian doctrine of "over-population" or "maximum carrying capacity" and all of the ponderous, pessimistic mystifications (and the underlying financial and cosmological assumptions undergirding them), that accompany it, including the totally tautological, and therefore infinitely useful, notion of "climate change". We would do well to recall that this mythology acually began in Venice with Giovanni Ortes (as Dr. Webster Tarpley has repeatedly pointed out), and that as such, the meme is the darling of corrupt, visionless and pessimistic financial oligarchs concerned not for the well-being of humanity but for the fragility of the institutions preserving their own power. One can, I think, even make the case that "de-population" masks a hidden and very racist agenda, since the focus seems to be on third world over-population and all that that notion has engendered, including covert sterilization projects that occasionally make the news. Reading between the lines of this carrying-capacity claptrap, there's just "too many useless eaters" (of a non-Caucasian non-European background) out there. But maximum carrying capacity is a "sustainable" meme(to use that favored term of the globalist "elites") only when there is technological stagnation and relative constancy. Under the broad and endlessly adjustable frontier of "sustainability" any manner of mischief can be promoted if it is for "the greater good", including depopulation. Let us be clear: "de-population" is one of those "soft language" linguistic swindles complained about by the late philosophical comedian, George Carlin.
You'll recall that Carlin lampooned the whole technique of "linguistic avoidance" of reality in what was probably the most non-politically correct comedy routine in history: "death" became a "terminal medical event," "crippled" or "handicapped" people become "handi-capable," "toilet paper" became "bathroom tissue," and so on. Similarly with "de-population," the "soft" term for genocide, be it by "slow" and "soft" means such as involuntary and covert sterilization regimes, or by the more tried and true Soviet, Maoist, and Nazi methods. "De-population's" real meaning is genocide, plain and simple.
It is therefore with a great deal of sadness that I note that now Francis I has thrown his mitre into the ring of the Malthusians and appears to have infallibly bought into the whole globaloney agenda(in reality, I think he's simply showing his true "colors"), including not only calls for "de-population" but for a "global government" to address such issues:
Pope Francis warns of destruction of Earth's ecosystem in leaked encyclical
Fortunately, Francis is apparently proposing no such "de-population" scheme in any genocidal sense:
"Francis also called for a new global political authority tasked with “tackling … the reduction of pollution and the development of poor countries and regions”. His appeal echoed that of his predecessor, pope Benedict XVI, who in a 2009 encyclical proposed a kind of super-UN to deal with the world’s economic problems and injustices."(Emphasis added).
But disturbingly, Francis slips back into the model of his predecessors:
According to the lengthy draft, which was obtained and published by L’Espresso magazine, the Argentinean pope will align himself with the environmental movement and its objectives. While accepting that there may be some natural causes of global warming, the pope will also state that climate change is mostly a man-made problem.
“Humanity is called to take note of the need for changes in lifestyle and changes in methods of production and consumption to combat this warming, or at least the human causes that produce and accentuate it,” he wrote in the draft. “Numerous scientific studies indicate that the greater part of the global warming in recent decades is due to the great concentration of greenhouse gases … given off above all because of human activity.”
The pope will also single out those obstructing solutions. In an apparent reference to climate-change deniers, the draft states: “The attitudes that stand in the way of a solution, even among believers, range from negation of the problem, to indifference, to convenient resignation or blind faith in technical solutions."  (Emphasis added)
If this is true, then Francis has decided to cherry-pick - doubtless with his charism of infallibility - among those scientific studies only those supporting his hypothesis, and has decided - again doubtless by dint of his charism of infallibility - to ignore all those indications that the data itself has been molded and squeezed in some cases to fit the theory. Of course, we'll hear from people who want to protect their system about the distinctions between "ordinary magisterium" and "extraordinary magisterium," but such details are beside the point, for the contradictions implicit in this latest encyclical, if the articles about it are true, are bad enough. How does one note "the need for changes in lifestyle and changes in methods of production" (left mystically undefined of course), without recourse to a technology? And once one admits this, one must admit of technological solutions to the dilemma that may possibly dispel the whole Malthusian meme.
Then we come to the ultimate and typically papal mystification, the attempt to "declare, define, and pronounce"(to paraphrase the words of Boniface VIII from Unam Sanctam) any opposition as "blind faith in technical solutions" while the pope conveniently and blithely ignores his(and the globalists') own blind faith in global bureaucracy and global governmental solutions. In other words, no countervailing arguments or data are - in the pope's infallible charism - of any merit whatsoever; by papal definition, to argue against the proposition is to be obstructing the proferred governmental and regulatory solutions. To believe otherwise is, by implication, a kind of socio-political heresy. And with papal claims being what they are, one wonders if the real motivation here is not only to "define away" any opposition as a kind of heresy, but also to align the papacy with the left-leaning tendencies of the global fascism that is being sponsored by the western oligarchs. And we know what the papacy's response to heresy has been from its gruesome, murderous, genocidal, barbaric, brutal and inescapable historical track record have been: imprisonment, torture, murder, and an "index of forbidden books", and hence ideas and notions, running contrary to the infallible whims and caprices of whatever occupant the See of Rome decides to champion at the moment.
And if you think it could not happen again under the auspices of this institution with its trendy "people-friendly" guitar masses and Saturday afternoon "quickies", think again, for that alignment of the papacy with the Mathusian agenda is what the international oligarchical mafia has perhaps been seeking: a religious "sanction" for all manner of tyrannous methods, regulations, and an infallible quashing of anyone who dares raise a voice in protest over the data and their interpretation of it. No Martin Luthers, Jean Calvins, Thomas Cranmers, or (much worse for such papal people) Photiuses of Constantinople or Gregory Palamases, or Marks of Ephesuses, thank you very much. There can be no "socio-political Protestantism" or "socio-political Eastern Orthodoxy" on these matters, because all that, says Francis, is "blind faith." Thus the papal call for a global government to "deal with" the "over-population problem" could be the modern equivalent of the medieval practice of handing over convicted "heretics" to the secular authority for execution, a wonderfully casuistical sophistry designed to avoid having to commit murder itself. The claims have not changed, only the methods have, and the "older methods", so long as the claims remain, could come roaring back, and with a vengance. And this encyclical - whether intended to or not - could be laying the groundwork for it.
Of course, we'll get the eventual "explanations" and "codiciles" and "clarifications" as have always occurred when this power-mad institution comes forth with the be-robed "explainers" to explain what he really meant and to explain away its manifest Gnostic goofiness and sociological dualisms. But that's the surest clue that this is not a teaching, it's an agenda, and the revolutionaries are simply using the cassocked and mitred symbols of confessional orthodoxy and authority to promote it and to close off discussion.
So, as for me and my house, when I get my copy of Francis' encyclical, I'll probably use it for, as Carlin said, "bathroom tissue," for non habemus papam. What we have, instead, is just another corrupt oligarch, using the power of his position to favor one, and overlook the other, side of a debate, and using his power to close off the other side as "blind faith" while obligingly parroting the memes of globaloney. (And for my Orthodox Catholic friends, you might want to rethink that whole "lifting of the anathemata" thing. It goes like this: "And to Leo IX and all his successors down to Francis I, let them be anathema anathema anathema." You might want to update the Synodikon.)
See you on the flip side...

UPDATE:Pope Francis: Care for Our Common Home

Pope Francis: Care for Our Common Home

John” Schellnhuber, Merkel’s Holdren: Now a Member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences

Hans Joachim “John” Schellnhuber
Hans Joachim “John” Schellnhuber, radical environmentalist and global warming advisor to Chancellor Merkel of Germany. He was the star of the Vatican press conference presenting the new encyclical in support of the global warming theory. Schellnhuber has just been named as a member of the Papal Academy of Sciences in the Vatican, despite the fact that he is an atheist. Some observers class Schellnhuber as a scientific pantheist. He embraces the Gaia theory of James Lovelock, according to which the earth is a living thing, locked in an existential struggle with the destructive forces of Shiva. Schellnhuber also subscribes to the carrying capacity theory developed by the Venetian crank Giammaria Ortes in the late 18th century. According to Schellnhuber, earth’s carrying capacity is limited to 1 billion persons, far below the current level of 7.32 billion. “In a very cynical way, it’s a triumph for science because at last we have stabilized something –- namely the estimates for the carrying capacity of the planet, namely below 1 billion people,” said Schellnhuber at a December 2009 global warming meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark. (“Scientist: Warming Could Cut Population to 1 Billion,” New York Times, March 13, 2009, at At this meeting, Schellnhuber appeared to amend reports of his statement to say that global warming could soon reduce earth’s alleged carrying capacity to 1 billion. Schellnhuber heads the Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU or Scientific Advisory Council of the German Federal Government for Global Environmental Changes), an aggressive neo-Malthusian propaganda organ, in addition to his post as founding Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).
Schellnhuber wants an Earth Constitution (replacing national constitutions and the UN Charter), a Global Council (no doubt of éminences vertes), and a Planetary Court. He has warned that “earth likely will be populated by at least 9 billion people by 2050…You have to imagine that these people will reach an average level of consumption that Portugal has, one of the poorer countries in Europe …When you imagine that if all these 9 billion people claim all these resources, then the earth will explode.” This is just the opposite of third world development. Schellnhuber’s global warming extremism thus appears analogous to the role of John Holdren, Obama’s White House science advisor. (Foto Hollin)
Schellnhuber’s emphatic statements amount to rhetoric, not science. The global warming hypothesis is in grave crisis and could soon collapse, as we can see in a 2013 Der Spiegel interview with top German meteorologist Hans von Storch, who remains lucid despite his status as a global warming supporter:
Storch: “So far, no one has been able to provide a compelling answer to why climate change seems to be taking a break. We’re facing a puzzle. Recent CO2 emissions have actually risen even more steeply than we feared. As a result, according to most climate models, we should have seen temperatures rise by around 0.25 degrees Celsius (0.45 degrees Fahrenheit) over the past 10 years. That hasn’t happened. In fact, the increase over the last 15 years was just 0.06 degrees Celsius (0.11 degrees Fahrenheit) — a value very close to zero. This is a serious scientific problem that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will have to confront….If things continue as they have been, in five years, at the latest, [i.e. 2018] we will need to acknowledge that something is fundamentally wrong with our climate models. A 20-year pause in global warming does not occur in a single modeled scenario. But even today, we are finding it very difficult to reconcile actual temperature trends with our expectations….The other possibility is that, in our simulations, we have underestimated how much the climate fluctuates owing to natural causes.” (“Climate Expert Hans von Storch: Why Is Global Warming Stagnating?,” Spiegel Online International, June 20, 2013, at Obviously, natural causes cannot be anthropogenic, but could easily turn out to be a matter of solar activity.
The five year deadline after which the anthropogenic global warming theory may collapse could account for the great haste with which Merkel and other politicians have embraced the “decarbonization” of the world at the recent G-7 conference, now followed by the encyclical. All the more reason to avoid a flight forward at the Paris conference at the end of this year.